Animals
Business
Crops
Environment
Food
General
Horticulture
Livestock
Machinery
Markets
Politics
Login
 
 
 
Submit to register and subscribe
(72,60 / year)
 
I forgot my password
Next articleVolgend Artikel

 11 dec 2019 11:22 

The environmental fate of microbial biocontrol agents


Microbial biological control agents (MBCAs) against pests and diseases in crops are regarded as sustainable tools in integrated pest management. In the European Union, biological control should be preferred to conventional chemical methods if they provide satisfactory pest reduction.

There is no reason to believe that all forms of biocontrol are intrinsically safe. Therefore requirements for registration to assure safety are needed. In the current registration procedure in the European Union, MBCAs are primarily treated as potentially risky organisms that not only produce toxic substances but are also dangerous because they can multiply, spread and genetically adapt. These characteristics give rise to a concern that released MBCAs will spread and become dominant in the environment, resulting in negative effects on other organisms in the natural environment or even humans.

These assumption led to extensive data requirements that are a time consuming and costly hurdle for bringing MBCAs onto the market. This paper focuses on the relevance and irrelevance of the data requirements for environmental fate and persistence of MBCAs. MBCAs are naturally occurring living organisms that are numerically enhanced to reduce specific plant pathogens or pests. In contrast to chemicals, direct toxicity is not the main mode of action, but rather a variety of mechanisms is involved, including competition, parasitism and activity of secondary metabolites. Their effects and residues cannot be evaluated as done for chemical substances and their breakdown products. Populations of introduced microorganisms always decline due to the natural biological buffering of the environment to levels that are within common fluctuations and ranges without strongly affecting microbial communities.

However, the currently used concept of a natural background level as a reference to which densities of MBCAs should decline is of limited value, in particular when endpoints cannot be defined from ecological theory or risk criteria. In conclusion we state that data requirements for persistence could be more freely interpreted in all cases where there is no a priori reason to assume that organisms will not be buffered by the agroecosystem. Since information is only needed ‘when relevant’, the European Union guidelines leave space for such a proportional interpretation of the data requirements on environmental fate.

INFO



  Newsflash
 
How can EU milk production be climate-friendly as well as socially and economically sustainable? Lees meer
 
 
Prolongation of EU State aid rules applicable to the agricultureLees meer
 
 
Maximum effort required to remove CIPC from potato storage sheds Lees meer
 
 
Commissioners Kyriakides and Wojciechowski at the International Green Week in Berlin Lees meer
 
 
Financing the green transitionLees meer
 
 
Commission invites comments on revised EU Emission Trading System State aid Guidelines Lees meer
 
 
Commission bans a neonicotinoid from EU market Lees meer
 
 
The FAO Food Price Index soared to a 5-year high in December 2019Lees meer
 
 
New Book to guide Potato Research and Development Lees meer
 
 
New Deal for ConsumersLees meer