Under new CAP rules, the Commission has to assess the impact of farm subsidies in relation to their objectives. The auditors examined the design of the Commission’s performance measurement system for farmers’ incomes and whether the necessary statistical data was properly defined and of an appropriate quality. They found that the system was not sufficiently well-designed and that the data had significant limitations.
“These key indicators, on which the Commission has to base its assessments, are not sufficiently reliable and are not linked clearly enough to CAP measures,” said Mrs Rasa Budbergytė, the Member of the European Court of Auditors responsible for the report. “As they stand, they are of no use in showing whether the subsidies have achieved their desired effect and reduced the income gap between farmers and others.”
No representative data is available on the disposable income of farm households, say the auditors, and there is no reliable system for comparing agricultural incomes with those in other sectors in order to justify support for farmers. Nor did the Commission or the Member States always ensure that the data used was of an appropriate quality. Vague objectives for some CAP measures and the absence of a baseline make it difficult to assess whether they will achieve their objectives.
The auditors visited six Member States which, between them, account for more than half the gross value added of European agriculture and whose farmers receive more than half the EU budget for agriculture, primarily in the form of direct payments: Germany, Spain, France, the Netherlands, Poland and Romania.
The auditors recommend that the Commission:
• develop a more comprehensive framework for providing information on disposable income and for comparing farmers’ incomes with incomes in other sectors of the economy;
• further develop the main farm income measurement tools so their potential can be better achieved;
• ensure that the analysis of farmers’ incomes is based on indicators, taking account of the current situation of agriculture, and on sufficient and consistent data for all CAP beneficiaries. This could be done by developing synergies between existing administrative data or by developing other suitable statistical tools;
• enhance the present quality assurance arrangements for the farm income statistics established by the Member States.
From the outset of the next programming period, the Commission should:
• define appropriate operational objectives and baselines against which the performance of the CAP measures can be compared;
• complement its current framework of performance indicators for evaluations with other relevant and good-quality data in order to measure the results achieved;
• and assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the measures designed to support farmers’ incomes.
